.....what results mean to him?
$225 Million is a lot of sparkplugs to spend on a marketing campaign to get what I saw in the news today. (see end of Post) I'm not going to critique the campaign in this post, just point out something that we talk about with clients everyday. The only thing that matters, really, is that product walks out the door at a faster pace - that we are building short and long-term value. Disclosure: I own a Chrysler product, a Dodge actually. I bought it not because of Dr. Z, but because the campaign for my particular car hit me in the ol' ticker and the design of the car itself is perfect - not because some german, super-rich guy was telling me to.
AdRants wrote about the response that Chrysler had when AdAge blasted their Ask Dr. Z campaign.
Here are some excerpts of their response:
An independent study performed by IAG Research found the Dr. Z campaign "significantly outperformed" almost every one of what the leading advertising research organization calls its "norms."
Dr. Z Campaign IAG Auto Norm
General Recall 50% 43%
Brand Recall 29% 22%
Message Recall 24% 16%
Likeability 16% 12%
Brand Linkage 59% 52%
Message Linkage 81% 69%
Likeability Linkage 54% 53%
Here is a quote from The Financial Times, page 13:
"DaimlerChrysler plans to cut vehicle shipments to its US-based Chrysler dealers by 24% during the current quarter in a belated drive to reduce swollen inventories of trucks and sports utility vehicles."
Followed by this headline in a sidebar article: